Continuing from the Sprint

You saw how the Sprint works. This is the platform it runs on.

The Intelligent Engineering Sprint proves the operating model on your backlog. DevNitro is that operating model, built as software: architecture your AI inherits, work that runs from your backlog, context that survives handoffs, and governance across your whole organization.

Same AI your team already uses. A different system around it.

Throughput you can see. Capacity you control.

DevNitro runs multiple agents against your real codebase at once, clearing issues straight from your backlog. Parallel work is explicit and governed, not scattered across private chats.

One run, many workers, one view. Capacity is a dial you set, not an accident of who opened which chat.

What makes it an operating model.

Not a better coding agent. A level above: the system that turns individual AI use into organizational capability.

Inherit, don't guess

Your architecture, built in from the first file.

DevNitro starts from an opinionated blueprint: a full production-grade solution with your conventions, data access, auth, and tests already wired. The AI inherits the architecture before it writes a line. That is where the correction tax goes.

Coding assistants guess. DevNitro knows.

Generated code that already looks like your team wrote it.
Work from the backlog

Execution starts from issues, not blank prompts.

Define work as epics and issues. DevNitro claims them, spins up workers, and executes against your codebase. Leadership plans in the backlog. The backlog is what runs.

The plan is the input. No translating a roadmap into prompts.
Context that outlives the session

Any teammate picks up the work where it stopped.

Conversations and decisions persist across sessions, interruptions, and people. A new session, or a different engineer, resumes with the full history and can search prior context. Knowledge stops leaking out at the end of every chat.

The context belongs to the organization, not to one person's chat window.
Governed at every level

Standards set once, inherited everywhere.

Agents, skills, commands, and personas are defined at four levels: company, team, project, and user. Set a security review at the company level and every team inherits it. Let a project add its own. This is how AI stops being scattered and starts being governed.

Company Team Project User
The same AI, governed. Set the rules once at the top. Refine by team, project, and person.
Verified before it merges

It checks its own work.

Each worker builds in its own worktree. Work merges back only after build and test gates pass, and DevNitro can navigate and screenshot the running app to confirm it actually works. Verification is in the pipeline, not bolted on after.

Build gates, test gates, and a real look at the running app before anything lands.

No vendor lock-in. Set at the company level.

Model vendors change. Pricing moves. Your operating model should not depend on any one of them. Choose the provider per company, team, or run.

Claude Code
GitHub Copilot
OpenAI Codex
Ollama (self-hosted)

Train the practice, or run the platform.

You can teach your team to approximate this by hand with the tools you already have. Or you can run it as software. Many organizations do both.

By hand, with your existing tools DevNitro
ContextDiscipline: you save it and re-feed it each sessionPersists automatically across sessions and handoffs
ArchitectureEnforced by review, after the factInherited from the blueprint, every file
GovernanceTribal knowledge, per developerCompany, team, project, and user levels
Parallel workCoordinated by hand, one prompt at a timeGoverned autonomous runs with visible capacity
VerificationYour review catches what it canBuild and test gates plus visual verification
ProviderLocked to each tool's modelClaude, Copilot, Codex, or Ollama, swappable

The Intelligent Engineering Sprint proves it on your backlog with a measured before and after. DevNitro is what keeps it running after.

Built with DevNitro.

DevNitro is built using its own blueprints, agents, and operating model every day. The platform runs on the same practice it sells. It was created by Chad Carter: 29 years architecting systems Fortune 500 companies depended on, a decade as a Microsoft MVP, and the author of best-selling technical books. He defined the Intelligent Engineering, the operating model for engineering organizations in the AI era. It's what comes after vibe coding.

The math is simple.

A mid-level developer costs roughly $15,000 to $20,000 per month, fully loaded. You only need to recover a small slice of that time for a seat to pay for itself. Everything above that is upside.

$1,000/ builder seat / month

Every developer on an autonomous run needs an active seat. Start self-serve today and onboard your team yourself, or have it installed on your backlog with a measured before and after through the Intelligent Engineering Sprint.

Give your organization the operating model.

Book an assessment and we will scope it on your real backlog, or start self-serve today.

An error has occurred.Reload 🗙
Reconnecting...

Connection lost. Attempting to reconnect.

Connection Lost

Unable to reconnect to the server. This can happen with too many open tabs.

Session Expired

Your session has ended. Please reload to continue.